Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-08-24 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's overall score of 80. Galaxy Note9 is a a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola One Zoom, but they are equally thin. Galaxy Note9 features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater pixel number in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit superior processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Zoom and Samsung Galaxy Note9 both have incredibly similar batteries duration.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a little more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.