Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 6.0, 5.1 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2015-07-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is much better than Moto X Style, having a overall score of 83.3 against 73.8. The Apple iPhone 11 construction is much newer and much thinner than Moto X Style's, although it's also a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto X Style has Android 6.0 operating system.
IPhone 11 features a lot better performance than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM, a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bits CPU. Moto X Style features a sharper display than iPhone 11, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher display density and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Moto X Style counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto X Style also has an external SD slot that allows up to 128 GB. The Motorola Moto X Style captures just a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 11, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Apple iPhone 11 has a little better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 4 percent more battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 costs more than the Moto X Style, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.