Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 9.x | Android 6.0, 5.1 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2015-07-28 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s has a global score of 83, which is much better than the Moto X Style's 73.8 global score. Even though the iPhone 6s and Moto X Style were released only 1 months apart, the iPhone 6s is way lighter and way thinner. IPhone 6s comes with iOS 9.x operating system, while Moto X Style has Android 6.0 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s has a superior processing power than Moto X Style, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores , an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor. Moto X Style has a slightly better screen than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a much higher pixels amount per inch in the screen and a larger display.
Motorola Moto X Style takes a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
IPhone 6s has a slightly better storage to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Moto X Style has a way better battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
The iPhone 6s not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.