Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 | -- |
| 2015-09-29 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 760.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's global score of 79.6. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much newer than Google Nexus 6P, it is just a bit heavier and thicker. The Google Nexus 6P has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior CPU than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, a camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.