Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 6.0 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2015-09-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 760.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's 79.6 general score. The Google Pixel 2 construction is notably newer and lighter, but also just a bit thicker than Google Nexus 6P. Google Nexus 6P has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a bit better screen pixel density, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Google Nexus 6P's memory for apps and games is very similar to Google Pixel 2's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a superior processor than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more processing cores. The Google Pixel 2 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Google Nexus 6P has greater battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.