Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 6.0 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-09-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 760.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting an 81.9 score against 79.6. Even though Google Pixel 4 is a little thicker than the Google Nexus 6P, it's just a bit lighter and also extremely newer. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Nexus 6P also has a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite higher screen density.
The Google Nexus 6P features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4 features a quite better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Google Nexus 6P counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, a camera in the back with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.