Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 65.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.2.2 |
| 2016-08-31 | 2013-07-23 |
| 5.84 x 2.80 x 0.51 inches | 5.41 x 2.80 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.10 ounces | 4.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Red |
| -- | Kevlar |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 182.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Motorola X8 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Dual-Core 1700 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | 400 MHz, quad-core GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 7.81 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2130mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 312 hours standby time |
| 5.2 | 4.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Ultra is slightly better than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro, getting a 65.3 score against 63.1. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Ultra has older 4.4.4 version and Kyocera DuraForce Pro has Android 7.1 Nougat version. Even though Motorola DROID Ultra is older than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro, it's design is extremely lighter and a lot thinner.
The Kyocera DuraForce Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola DROID Ultra, and although they both have a same size screen, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has a much better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a greater pixel number per screen inch. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro has a bit superior processor than Motorola DROID Ultra, and although they both have 2 GB of RAM, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has a higher number of cores (but slower).
Kyocera DuraForce Pro counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro counts with a much better battery life than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro captures better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Ultra, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola DROID Ultra is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.