Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 65.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-08-31 | 2018-05-16 |
| 5.84 x 2.80 x 0.51 inches | 5.94 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.10 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 182.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| -- | LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 7.48 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto E5 Play is a little bit better than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, with a 65.5 score against 63.1. Motorola Moto E5 Play's body is newer, thinner and extremely lighter than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro. Kyocera DuraForce Pro counts with a brighter screen than Moto E5 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much better screen pixels density.
Kyocera DuraForce Pro features a bit better processor than Moto E5 Play, and although they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has 4 more processing cores. Kyocera DuraForce Pro features just a bit better camera than Moto E5 Play, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has a way more MP back-facing camera.
The Kyocera DuraForce Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto E5 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has 32 GB internal memory capacity. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Moto E5 Play, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
The Moto E5 Play is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.