Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 50.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-09-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.21 x 2.22 x 0.99 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 164.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 154 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1530mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is a lot better than Kyocera DuraXV LTE's score of 50.8. The Motorola DROID Turbo is an older device than the Kyocera DuraXV LTE, but it's way thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Motorola DROID Turbo has an incredibly better display than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a way better pixels density, a lot bigger screen and a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a superior processing unit than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher amount of RAM memory and an additional graphics co-processor. The Kyocera DuraXV LTE features a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 16 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 64 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better camera than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better battery life than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.