Search


Compare phones

LG Remarq

MN240, LN240
Global Score
34.338
Basic Information
LGHTC
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.1
2010-03-222008-09-16
3.50 x 2.50 x 0.60 inches4.09 x 2.32 x 0.62 inches
3.80 ounces3.88 ounces
$ 250.00$ 139.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
129 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.65.7
Performance
--TI OMAP850 chipset
processor Single-Core 201 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
10
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.12.7
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
5.5 hours talk time270 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
2.42.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0, EDR

Comparison review

HTC Touch Viva is much better than the LG Remarq, with a 38 score against 34.3. Although it's the best device we compare here, the HTC Touch Viva construction is older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than LG Remarq. HTC Touch Viva has a bit sharper screen than LG Remarq, and although they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240, the HTC Touch Viva also has a little more pixels per display inch.

The HTC Touch Viva's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in LG Remarq, although the HTC Touch Viva also has a larger number of faster cores. The LG Remarq features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than HTC Touch Viva. HTC Touch Viva counts with improved battery duration than LG Remarq, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity instead of 900mAh.

HTC Touch Viva features a little bit better camera than LG Remarq, because it has a camera with way more megapixels.

The HTC Touch Viva not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.