Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 73.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2014-09-04 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Holographic white | Gold |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 310.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), having a general score of 76.7 against 73.4. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG Stylo 6 has the newer 10 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, giving some nice extra features and enhanced performance. LG Stylo 6's body is notably newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it's also a lot heavier.
Moto X (2014) features just a bit better hardware performance than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The LG Stylo 6 has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Moto X (2014) has a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in low-light environments and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality pictures, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG Stylo 6 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.