Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than the LG V10, getting an 88.3 score against 77.7. Galaxy S10's body is way newer, just a bit thinner and lighter than the LG V10. The Galaxy S10 has a bit superior processing unit than LG V10, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little sharper screen than LG V10, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S10 has just a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures. LG V10 counts with a slightly better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.