Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 66 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-05-01 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is much better than the Motorola Moto E5, with a general score of 77 against 66. LG V20's construction has the same weight than the Motorola Moto E5, but it is somewhat thinner. The LG V20 has a little bit better processing power than Moto E5, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the LG V20 also has more RAM.
The LG V20 has a sharper display than Motorola Moto E5, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V20 also has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way better pixel number per screen inch. The LG V20 counts with a better camera than Moto E5, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light situations, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures.
The LG V20 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto E5, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto E5 counts with longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V20 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.