Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 6.0, 5.1 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2015-07-28 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting a general score of 87.1 against 73.8. The LG Velvet design is much newer and a lot thinner, but just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. The Moto X Style has a much better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a superior hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
The LG Velvet has a much better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also has a larger diafragm aperture, a larger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and a back camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG Velvet has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.