Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-10-27 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 78.6 score against 74.8. Even though LG V10 and the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 were released with only a few months difference, the LG V10 design is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Both of these phones include the same Android 5.1 OS, so they should provide very similar OS features.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little better performance than LG V10, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG V10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440px resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
The LG V10 has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Motorola DROID Turbo 2, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V10 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 16 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.