Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2015-01-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gray and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 185.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G Flex 2 has an overall score of 75.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Although the LG G Flex 2 is extremely older and just a little thicker than Moto G Fast, it's construction is still lighter. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G Flex 2 has the previous 5.0 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
LG G Flex 2 has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a higher display pixel density. The Motorola Moto G Fast has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The LG G Flex 2 has just a bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores and a 3 GB RAM memory, the LG G Flex 2 also has an additional GPU and a 64 bits processor. The Motorola Moto G Fast has greater battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Moto G Fast shoots much better photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G Fast also has a better resolution camera in the back.
LG G Flex 2 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.