Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2012-05-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 195.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III is a bit better than the Moto G Fast, with a 74.8 score against 72.2. Galaxy S III is an extremely older cellphone than Moto G Fast, but Samsung was able to make it a little thinner and notably lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S III has the previous 4.3 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a little better performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cores. The Galaxy S III has a better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Moto G Fast has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S III, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G Fast also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Fast has a superior camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a way larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments, a back camera with way more MP, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger back camera sensor.
Moto G Fast counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has a 90% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S III is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.