Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-02-12 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Gray, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 29.22mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Power has a general score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 general score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G Power has a newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you some additional features and some performance improvements. The Motorola Moto G Power body is much newer, but thicker and heavier than LG G Pro 2.
The LG G Pro 2 features a little more vivid screen than Moto G Power, although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller display. LG G Pro 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power, because although it has lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Moto G Power captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power also has a way bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations, a back camera with a better 16 mega pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Moto G Power features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Moto G Power is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.