Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 73.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 310.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a bit better than Moto X (2014), having a general score of 79.7 against 73.4. The Moto G Stylus construction is way newer and a little bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than Moto X (2014). These phones come with Android OS, but Moto G Stylus has newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, offering a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 4 less cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Stylus has a much better battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 74% more battery size.
Moto G Stylus takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a much larger aperture, a camera with much more megapixels and a much larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.