Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-07-28 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is just a bit better than the Moto X Style, getting a 79.8 score against 73.8. The Moto Z4 body is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than Moto X Style. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z4 has the newer 10 version while Moto X Style has Android 6.0 version.
The Moto Z4 has a superior processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. Moto X Style has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Moto Z4 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto Z4 has improved battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity.
Moto Z4 captures better pictures and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z4 also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola Moto Z4 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.