Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 365.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, getting a general score of 83.8 against 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is extremely newer, just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Galaxy Note 3 and Galaxy A50 have very similar processing units, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser 2300 MHz processing cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit inferior pixel count per display inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy A50 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a way larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, a back camera with a way higher 25 mega-pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy A50 has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.