Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0, 5.1 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2015-07-28 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than Moto X Style, getting a 91.8 score against 73.8. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version and Moto X Style has Android 6.0 version. Although the Galaxy A71 5G is just a little bit heavier than the Moto X Style, it's a lot thinner and much newer.
Galaxy A71 5G features a superior processing power than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Moto X Style features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures much better videos and photos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G features a really longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.