Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Beam 2
SM-G3858Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 55.6 | 56.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 |
| 2014-04-24 | 2014-05-13 |
| 5.30 x 2.76 x 0.46 inches | 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.01 ounces |
| Gray | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 199 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.76 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 5.61 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.5 | 4.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E has a general score of 56.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Beam 2's 55.6 score. Motorola Moto E's design is somewhat lighter but just a bit thicker than the Galaxy Beam 2, and both of them were released only 1 months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto E has 4.4.4 version and Galaxy Beam 2 has Android 4.2.2.
Moto E counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Beam 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 960 x 540px. Moto E counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Beam 2, although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 32 GB against 64 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Beam 2 and the Moto E both count with very similar processing units, because although the Moto E has a lower number of 1200 megahertz cores, and they both have 1 GB of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Beam 2 counts with better battery duration than Moto E, because it has 2600mAh of battery capacity instead of 1980mAh.
The Galaxy Beam 2 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto E. Both have a back facing camera with a 5 megapixels.
The Moto E is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.