Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 52.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 2.3 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2011-08-30 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 4.70 x 2.44 x 0.46 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 3.99 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1079.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 3.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 494 pixels per inch | 258 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Yes |
| 8.7 | 6.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 7.56 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 2.5 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 4.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 312 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola PRO+, getting a general score of 98.9 against 52.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Motorola PRO+ has Android 2.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much heavier than Motorola PRO+, it's way thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better display than Motorola PRO+, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a way higher screen pixel density and a really larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola PRO+, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola PRO+, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Motorola PRO+, because it has a 181% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola PRO+, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more than the Motorola PRO+, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.