Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 365.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's global score of 79.5. The LG V35 ThinQ design is incredibly newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much worse pixel density. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a way larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments and a camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.