Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 365.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, getting a score of 79.7 against 79.5. Although the Moto G Stylus is newer than the Galaxy Note 3, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G Stylus has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, although it has a little smaller display, a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a just a little lower screen density. Moto G Stylus has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. Moto G Stylus counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much higher 48 MP resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger aperture and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola Moto G Stylus is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.