Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
Motorola Droid Turbo
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a general score of 80.7 against 76.4. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, giving you lots of additional features. Although Galaxy Note 3 is older than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's body is way thinner and a bit lighter.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note 3, although it has a worse graphics co-processor and a lower number of cores , they both have 3 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better display than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.