Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 general score. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older than Moto G Stylus (2021), it's body is a little bit thinner and way lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit lower screen pixels density. The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a much larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.