Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
SM-N9008V| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Holographic white |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, getting an 81.2 score against 76.7. Galaxy Note 3's design is way lighter and a little bit thinner than LG Stylo 6, although it was released 7 years before. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper display than LG Stylo 6, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a bit smaller screen and a just a bit lower pixels density. LG Stylo 6 features a processor that's very similar to the Galaxy Note 3 one, because although the LG Stylo 6 has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and 4 more 2.3 GHz cpu cores.
LG Stylo 6 has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.