Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.1. IPhone X is a a lot newer and a little thinner device than the Galaxy Note 3, although it's a little bit heavier. The iPhone X counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a larger number of cores.
Apple iPhone X features a display that's just as good as the Galaxy Note 3 one, although the Apple iPhone X also has a quite larger screen, a little better display density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436. Apple iPhone X counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 features longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. IPhone X captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy Note 3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Note 3, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.