Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3's score of 81.1. Even though the Motorola One 5G Ace is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note 3, it's thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy Note 3 has a better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit worse screen pixels density and a bit smaller screen.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% more battery size. Motorola One 5G Ace has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola One 5G Ace not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.