Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is newer, just a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy Note 3. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a bit lower screen density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy Note 3, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 4 more 2.3 GHz processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a much bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Galaxy A50 has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.