Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
SM-N910U, SM-N910C, SM-N910FD| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 340.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos Octa 7 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 4's overall score of 79.2. The LG V35 ThinQ design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note 4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 features a slightly better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse number of pixels per inch of display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ's camera is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note 4's camera, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller back camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a way larger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 4, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.