Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 335.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge has a score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy Note Edge has the previous 5.0 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note Edge is older and just a little bit thicker than LG Q70, it's body is still lighter.
The Galaxy Note Edge features a bit more powerful processor than LG Q70, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note Edge counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The LG Q70 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a larger aperture and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The LG Q70 has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG Q70 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Note Edge is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.