Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 5.1 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 7.3 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge is slightly better than LG V10, with a score of 81.7 against 78.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note Edge has the older 5.0 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Even though Galaxy Note Edge is older than the LG V10, it's body is just a little thinner and a little lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has a bit better looking display than LG V10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge counts with a quite better processing power than LG V10, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores and an extra GPU.
LG V10 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 0.38 inches camera sensor and a same resolution camera, the LG V10 also has faster video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
LG V10 has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note Edge and the LG V10 count with similar battery performance.
The Galaxy Note Edge costs more money than the LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.