Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Edge's global score of 81.7. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little heavier phone than Galaxy Note Edge, but both have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy Note Edge has Android 5.0 version, providing you some additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy Note Edge features just a bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a much less megapixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.