Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 335.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Edge is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, having an 81.7 score against 79.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note Edge has 5.0 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Galaxy Note Edge's design is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Moto G Stylus, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. Galaxy Note Edge counts with a lot better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a way larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge costs a bit more than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.