Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 335.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 81.7 against 79.8. The Galaxy Note Edge is an notably older cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note Edge has an older 5.0 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Note Edge has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy Note Edge counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
Motorola One Hyper counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.