Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 270.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto X4, getting an 89.7 score against 74.4. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is notably newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto X4. Motorola Moto X4 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, better video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite features a much longer battery performance than Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more money than Motorola Moto X4, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.