Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 74.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 4.80 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 284.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is way better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a extremely newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z, although it's much thicker and much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better performance than Moto Z, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Motorola Moto Z has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels density. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.