Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-10-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting an 86.3 score against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a way newer phone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Galaxy S10e has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.