Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
128 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 87.3 against 81.3. Galaxy S6's body is lighter and just a little thinner than the LG V35 ThinQ, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel count per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 features a little bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra GPU. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S6 have similar cameras, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S6 is also cheaper than the LG V35 ThinQ, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.