Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
64 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 85.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-04-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminium and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S6's global score of 85.1. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has a more recent 10 version while Galaxy S6 has Android 5.0, so it gives you some nice extra features and better performance. LG K92's body is way newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the Galaxy S6.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 has a bit superior processing unit than LG K92, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy S6 has a lot better screen than LG K92, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
LG K92 captures better photos and videos than Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG K92 counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2550mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG K92 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.