Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
64 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 85.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 has an overall score of 85.1, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. The Galaxy S6 is a somewhat lighter phone than Moto Z3 Play, but they are equally thin. Galaxy S6 counts with a more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy S6 has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Samsung Galaxy S6 takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 Play counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S6 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.