Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
64 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 85.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-04-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black |
| Aluminium and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 85.1 score against 81. The Galaxy S6 body is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro, although it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy S6 has older 5.0 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density. Galaxy XCover Pro has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S6 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy S6 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and a camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S6 is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.