Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0, 5.1 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-07-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is way better than the Moto X Style's 73.8 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Moto X Style has Android 6.0. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit heavier than Moto X Style, it's extremely thinner and noticeably newer.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater performance than Moto X Style, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto X Style has a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a little higher number of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto X Style shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better 21 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a little more than Motorola Moto X Style, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.