Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-02-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blush gold and Noir black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2510mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Motorola razr (2019) were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is somewhat lighter but a little thicker. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little greater pixels density and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a much worse resolution back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has greater battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.