Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2015-10-27 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a general score of 78.2 against 74.8. Xiaomi Poco M3's design is way newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco M3 has the newer 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has Android 5.1 version.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of 2 gigahertz cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 60 percent bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a way higher resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 costs a little more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.