Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
VerizonSM-N900V
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's 81.1 score. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, it is just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a larger sensor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a little more money than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.