Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2015-01-05 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Gray and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 185.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than LG G Flex 2, getting a general score of 79 against 75.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's body is a lot newer and a little thinner, but incredibly heavier than LG G Flex 2. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some extra features and performance improvements.
The LG G Flex 2 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU. The LG G Flex 2 has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a very superior battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a lot better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S costs more than the LG G Flex 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.